Analisis E-Leadership Pada E-Government Pemerintah Daerah Demi Menyukseskan Transformasi New Normal di Era Pandemi Covid-19
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze e-leadership in the implementation of e-government by Indonesian regional government as an effort to succeed the transformation to the new normal. The research was carried out using qualitative approach with research data in the form of secondary data. The Data were then analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques consisting of four stages, namely data review, data reduction, data categorization, and data interpretation. The results of the study indicate that the e-government in regional governments still not implemented effectively and efficiently. This can be seen from the lack of integration in the application of e-government between government agencies, both at the central and regional levels. This situation also illustrates that e-leadership in the local government is still not optimal. Methods for optimizing e-leadership in e-government consist of: 1) Increasing e-leader knowledge of IT used in regional governments; 2) Creating a work culture that is conducive to the implementation of e-government; 3) Implement SPBE literacy promotion; 4) Development of PNS functional positions; 5) Implementation of partnerships with non-government parties to improve the technical competence of ASN related to e-government; 6) Using the EMAC approach to select e-leader candidates; and 7) Improving e-leadership capability in various decision-making domains. The optimization of e-leadership in the implementation of e-government by the regional government is expected to succeed the transformation into the new normal era through the dissemination of information to the public about the new normal concept and the importance of compliance with health protocols.
References
[2] Kominfo.jatimprov.go.id, “Kota Blitar Jawa Timur Jadi Tempat Pertama Uji Coba PPKM Level 1 Jawa – Bali,” 2021. http://kominfo.jatimprov.go.id/read/umum/kota-blitar-jawa-timur-jadi-tempat-pertama-uji-coba-ppkm-level-1-jawa-bali.
[3] D. Karno and L. Sulaiman, “Peran pemerintah dan tenaga kesehatan dalam penanggulangan covid-19,” J. Ilm. permas, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 665–672, 2021.
[4] D. Ginanjar, “Peran pemerintah daerah pada penanganan covid-19,” J. Polit. Pemerintah. dharma praja, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 52–68, 2020.
[5] M. Huda and N. S. Yunas, “The development of e-goverment system in Indonesia,” J. bina praja, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 97–108, 2016.
[6] M. M. Amyan, M. Al-saudi, and H. H. Al-Onizat, “The Effective Utilization of Knowledge Management in E-Government: A Case Study of E-Government in Jordan,” Eur. Sci. J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 290–308, 2016.
[7] E. S. Sintiya, T. D. Susanto, and A. C. Puspitaningrum, “Electronics-Leadership (E-Leadership) dalam Sektor E-Government: Literature Review,” J. Nas. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 158–168, 2020.
[8] T. Savolainen, “Trust-Building in e-Leadership: A Case Study of Leaders’ Challenges and Skills in Technology-Mediated Interaction,” J. Glob. Bus. issues, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 45–56, 2014.
[9] E. P. Anugrah, “Electronic Record Keeping to Support Indonesia EGovernment Implementation,” Rec. Libr. J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31–44, 2020.
[10] I. G. Prihanto, “Studi Komparasi Pengembangan e‐Government Negara‐Negara Anggota Perserikatan Bangsa Bangsa untuk Mendukung Pengembangan e‐Government di Indonesia,” IPTEK-KOM, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 155–170, 2013.
[11] Suhardi, A. Sofia, and A. Andriyanto, “Evaluating e-government and good governance correlation,” J.ICT Res. Appl., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 236–262, 2015.
[12] E. H. Alkhajeh, “Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance,” J. Hum. Resour. Manag. Res., pp. 1–10, 2018.
[13] M. Madanchian, N. Hussein, F. Noordin, and H. Taherdoost, “Effect of leadership on organizational performance,” Econ. Educ., pp. 115–119, 2016.
[14] M. A. Kareem and Z. J. Haseeni, “E-government and its impact on organizational performance,” Int. J. Manag. Commer. Innov., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 664–672, 2015.
[15] O. Mahmoudi, “The impact of e-government on organizational agility: case study of governmental banks in Iran,” Int. J. Manag. Account. Econ., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1142–1160, 2015.
[16] L. Alfehaid and E. E. Mohamed, “Understanding the influence of E-leadership on Virtual Team Performance Empirical Study,” Int. J. Bus. Appl. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 21–36, 2019.
[17] B. J. Avolio, J. J. Sosik, S. S. Kahai, and B. Baker, “E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission”,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 104–131, 2014.
[18] J. Samartinho, J. Faria, and P. R. Silva, “Model for the perception of the specific e-leadership skills and features in learning management systems environments,” Rev. Da GIIPS, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 105–133, 2015.
[19] J. L. Cordery and C. Soo, “Overcoming impediments to virtual team effectiveness,” Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 457–500, 2008.
[20] M. N. Aly, A. R. Putri, G. Rosyida, and A. Hamidah, “Panduan aman new normal menghadapi pandemi covid-19,” J. layanan Masy., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 415–422, 2020.
[21] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Quantitative and QUalitative APproach. London: Sage Publishing, 2014.
[22] S. Siyoto and A. Sodik, Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing, 2015.
[23] M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis. (terjemahan). Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat, 2005.
[24] Indonesia.go.id, “Ketika Indeks e-Government Indonesia Naik 19 Peringkat,” 2020. https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/kuliner/1946/ketika-indeks-e-government-indonesia-naik-19-peringkat (accessed Nov. 09, 2021).
[25] N. Zanda, “Penerapan SPBE Transformasi dari e-Government Menuju i-Government,” aptika.kominfo.go.id, 2019. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2019/02/penerapan-spbe-transformasi-dari-egovernment-menuju-i-government/ (accessed Nov. 09, 2021).
[26] D. B. Napitupulu, “Pengujian kerangka kerja pemeringkatan e-government di Indonesia (PeGI): studi kasus di tingkat kementerian,” J. Penelit. Komun., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 2017.
[27] Www.kominfo.go.id, “Indeks SPBE 2020 Meningkat, Pemerintah Tidak Berpuas Diri,” 2021. https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/32478/indeks-spbe-2020-meningkat-pemerintah-tidak-berpuas-diri/0/berita (accessed Nov. 09, 2021).
[28] M. Van Wart, A. Roman, and S. Pierce, “Integrating ICT adoption issues into (e-) leadership theory,” Telemat. Informatics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 527–537, 2016.
[29] C. Liu et al., “E-leadership: an empirical study of organizational leaders’ virtual communication adoption,” Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J., 2018.
[30] W. Li, K. Liu, M. Belitski, A. Ghobadian, and N. O’Regan, “e-Leadership through strategic alignment: an empirical study of small- and mediumsized enterprises in the digital age,” J. Inf. Technol., vol. 31, pp. 85–206, 2016.
[31] W. Sugeng, P. Kukuh, P. Dhanny, Y. Elia, P. Ogis, and A. Rizqi, “Penerapan Protokol Kesehatan COVID-19 di Era New Normal Pada Kampung Tangguh Desa Karangdoro, Terminal Jajag, dan RTH Maron Genteng, Kabupaten Banyuwangi,” Multidiscip. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2020.
[32] C. I. Atmajanti, G. C. Richtiara, K. Khairunnisa, D. Az-zahra, N. A. Sophia, and A. Rahmawati, “Edukasi protokol kesehatan new normal dan pengenalan dunia bisnis di tengah pandemi covid-19 melalui media sosial,” J. layanan Masy., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 472–478, 2020.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
JATIS oleh http://jurnal.mdp.ac.id/index.php/jatisi disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
