Evaluasi Keberhasilan Sistem Informasi Universitas

  • Agus Prasetyo Utomo 1Progdi Sistem Informasi, Fakultas Teknologi Informasi & Industri, Universitas Stikubank Semarang
  • Novita Mariana Universitas Stikubank Semarang
  • Saefurrohman Saefurrohman Universitas Stikubank Semarang
Keywords: Information System Evaluation, Information System Success Model, Delone and McLean Models, User Satisfaction, University Information Systems

Abstract

Information system success evaluation research is not a new research topic. However, studying the factors that influence the success of information systems in universities is one that is quite interesting for some researchers. This study aims to examine how the influence of information quality, system quality, and service quality on satisfaction and the effect on net benefits perceived by users of university information systems. As many as 180 undergraduate and graduate students from 6 faculties at Stikubank University taken part in this study. The partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach is used to validate the research model. Empirical results show that information quality, system quality and service quality have a significant positive relationship with user satisfaction for using university information systems, while user satisfaction also shows a significant negative relationship with system user perceived net benefits. The results obtained from this study provide reinforcement of the findings from previous studies related to the evaluation of information system success models.

 

Keywords:.   

References

[1]. Qureshi, Z. H. and Qazi Abro, M. M, “EFFICIENT USE OF ICT IN ADMINISTRATION”, International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management., IV(10), pp. 540–550, 2016.
[2]. Jaleel, M. A., “Administration of Information in Higher Education-Role of ICT”., 3(2), pp. 935–938.
[3]. Ahituv, N., “A Systematic Approach Toward Assessing the Value of an Information System,” MIS Quarterly., 4(December), pp. 61–75, 1980. doi: 10.2307/248961.
[4]. Kumar, K,“Post Implementation Evaluation of Computer- Based Information -Systems : Current Practices,” Communications of the ACM., 33(2), pp. 203–212, 1990.
[5]. Beynon-Davies, P., Owens, I. and Williams, M. D, “Information systems evaluation and the information systems development process,” Journal of Enterprise Information Management., 17(4), pp. 276–282., 2004., doi: 10.1108/17410390410548689.
[6]. W.H. Delone, E.R. McLean, “The Delone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update,” J. Manage. Inform Sys., 19 (4), 9–30, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.
[7]. Jiang, J., Klein, G. and Carr, C, “Measuring Information System Service Quality: SERVQUAL from the Other Side,” MIS Quarterly., 26(1), pp. 145–166, 2002 doi: 10.2307/4132321.
[8]. Bharati, P. and Berg, D, “Managing information systems for service quality: a study from the other side,” Information Technology & People., 16(2), pp. 183–202, 2003, doi: 10.1108/09593840310478685.
[9]. Thong, J. Y. . and Yap, C.-S, “Information Systems Effectiveness : A User Satisfaction Approach,” Information processing management., 32(5), pp. 601–610,1996.
[10]. Palm, J. et al, “Determinants of User Satisfaction with a Clinical Information System,” in AMIA Symposium., pp. 614–618, 2006
[11]. Davies, B. et al, “Measuring and managing service quality,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning., 17(1), pp. 33–40, 1999, doi: 10.1108/02634509910253795
[12]. Tate, M. et al, “Information Systems Success Research : the “ Twenty Year Update ?” Panel report from PACIS, 2011”, Communications of the association for Information Systems, 34(64), pp. 1235–1246, 20014
[13]. Song, J. et al., “Application discoverability and user satisfaction in mobile application stores: An environmental psychology perspective,” Decision Support Systems., 59(1), pp. 37–51., 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2013.10.004.
[14]. Krishnaveni, R. and Meenakumari, J, “Usage of ICT for Information Administration in Higher education Institutions – A study,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Development., 1(3), pp. 282–286., 2010., doi: 10.7763/IJESD.2010.V1.55
[15]. Juma, K. S., Raihan, A. and Clement, C. K, “Role of ICT in Higher Educational Administration in Uganda,” World Journal of Educational Research., 3(1), pp. 1–10., 2016, doi: 10.22158/wjer.v3n1p1.
[16]. Carlsson, S. A., “Advancing Information Systems Evaluation ( Research ): A Critical Realist Approach,” Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation., 6(2), pp. 11–20., 2003.
[17]. DeLone & McLean, E.R., “Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research”, 3(1), pp. 60-95., 1992.
[18]. Irani, Z, “Information systems evaluation: Navigating through the problem domain,” Information and Management, 40(1), pp. 11–24, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00128-8.
[19]. Brown, A., “IS evaluation in practice,” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation., 8(3), pp. 169–178, 2005.
[20]. Petter, S., DeLone, W. & McLean, E., “Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships”., European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), pp. 236-263., 2008.
[21]. Kaisara, G. and Pather, S., “The e-Government evaluation challenge: A South African Batho Pele-aligned service quality approach,” Government Information Quarterly., Elsevier Inc., 28(2), pp. 211–221, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.008.
[22]. Al-adaileh, R. M., “An Evaluation of Information Systems Success : A User Perspective - the Case of Jordan Telecom Group,” European Journal of Scientific Research., 37(2), pp. 226–239., 2009.
[23]. Bokhari, R. H., “The relationship between system usage and user satisfaction : a meta-analysis,” Journal of Enterprise Information Management., 18(2), pp. 211–234., 2005, doi: 10.1108/17410390510579927.
[24]. Andersson, T. and von Hellens, L. A, “Information systems work quality’, Information and Software Technology”, 39(12), pp. 837–844. doi: 10.1016/S0950-5849(97)00042-6., 1997.
[25]. Akter, S., Ray, P. and D’Ambra, J, “Viewing systems as services: the role of service quality,” International Con., pp. 1–18., 2011., Available at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/3125/.
[26]. Seddon, P., Patry, M. and Kiew, M, “A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success,” in International Conference On Information Systems (ICIS)., pp. 99–110., 1994.
[27]. Roky, H. and Meriouh, Y, “Evaluation by users of an industrial information system ( XPPS ) based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success,” Procedia Economics And Finance., 26(0), pp. 903–913, 2015., doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00903-X.
[28]. Robbins, S.P. & Coulter. Management. Prentice Hall 7, th editio, 2002.
[29]. Seddon, P.B., “A respecification and extension of the delone and mclean model of is success. Information systems research”., 8(3), pp. 240–253., 1997.
[30]. Seddon, P.&Kiew, M.Y, “A partial test and development of delone and mclean’s model of is success,” Australasian Journal of Information Systems., 4(1), 1996.
[31]. Gorla, N., Somers, T. M. and Wong, B, “Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems., Elsevier B.V, 19(3), pp. 207–228., 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001.
[32]. Xu, J., Benbasat, I. and Cenfetelli, R. T., “Integrating Service Quality with System and Information Quality: An Empirical Test in the E-Service Context,” Mis Quarterly., 37(3), pp. 777–794, 2013.
[33] J. F. Hair Jr, G. T. M. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128.
[34] C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[35] J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Published
2023-03-15